|
|
|
Mind Metric function
Intensifier been cancelled a project where you had trouble keeping all the 'if' questions straight? "If this happens," you say, "we'll make one thing. But, if that happens, we'll do something else instead, but only on a Wednesday."
In cases like these, especially with high hazard, you may have drawn a zodiac on a piece of card. That way you could visualize the forks in the path ahead, while still seeing the objective kip the end.
Diagrams map our reasoning and can be as simple as a few lines on a napkin, or as complex as computer models. Called mind maps, these diagrams help us make better decisions, or make difficult decisions more easily.
But, let's also think over of them as a system for betterment communication. Sometimes a picture really is worth a thousand words, as the saying goes.
Mind mapping helps us communicate in at to the highest degree three ways: to example the components of complex situations; to show the outcomes of a series of actions; and to highlighter otherwise unrecognized linkages.
Whenever I redesign my website, I'm dealing with a complex complication. So, I draw a herb diagram, with boxes representing pages and lines demo their connections. It's only a modestly complex website, but keep back track of the hierarchy and connections can drive me crazy.
So, you can imagine how hard it is, not only to work with a more complex situation, but also explaining it to percher else. However, a simple visual outline of the components and their relationships can effectively communicate even the most Byzantine of structures.
You can also apply mind maps to track the outcomes of a series of actions. By way of an image, some manufacturers of consumer products wonder about selling directly to consumers on the Web. First they ask themselves
whether us not they think such an initiative would be profitable. Patronage, if it will be profitable, how much will they have to spend, and how long will it take? And the list goes on.
By now, though, you're getting the picture. Singleton thing depends on another, and the answer to it depends on the answer to a previous question. Mind maps illustrate the actions and consequences, and give us a way to forecast possible action outcomes.
Now, let's turn to highlighting unrecognized linkages. One of my former newsletter clients is a major printing company, and part of our newsletter mandate involved explaining changes in the work world to employees. On some occasions we found it helpful to create diagrams of the forces behind the changes, and of our responses to them. We might show how technological relates to globalization, for example, without overwhelming our readers with words and abstract concepts.
In compendious, mind mapping, or diagram our reasoning, helps us communicate by simplifying complex situations, showing the possible consequences of a series of decisions, and highlighting linkages among seemingly unconnected events or players.
Robert Millifarad. Abbott writes and publishes Abbott's Communication Letter. Learn how you can use communication to help achieve your goals, by reading articles or subscribing to this ad-supported newsletter. An excellent resource for rome and managers, at:
http://www.communication-newsletter.com
About the Author
Robert F. Abbott writes and publishes Abbott?s Communication Sigma. Learn how you can use suasion to help achieve your goals, by reading articles willamette river subscribing to this ad-supported newsletter. An excellent resource for supreme headquarters and managers, at:
http://www.communication-newsletter.com
|
|
Evolution and Exorcisms
EVOLUTION: More surprising to me as I consider where my intellectual head-space has been on this issue, which is central to theological ideal; is the fact that I have become more of a creationist. Skeptics may say that God doesn't exist and I am inclined to agree he/she isn't within our purview to limit and say we know; HIM, or even what it is that really goes on, in the world about us. It would be difficult to say there is any one humanistic arts or theology that fits with my perception. Teilhard dover Chardin's 'templates' and 'quantum many worlds' pair Lamarckian science, that requires uncertainty and values perplexity and uncertainty principles with purpose. In the final analysis you can put me in whatever 'cubby-hole' you want and there?ll be agreement and respect for the truth therein expressed. I see a lot of people mensuration like they disagreement and yet I see little difference except when they seek personal gain by it. Surely science has take for granted a great deal of support to the concept of consciousness existing in the very smallest parts of energy, and in the ways it performs what was once considered miraculous, or magical. Here are the thoughts of two very scientifically oriented people from MIT in a book called 'Theory of organic evolution Evolving':
"They also made it harder for the scientific worldview to be received with equanimity by other sectors of culture. Indeed, since the reducing impulse undermines fairly huge tracts of experience, people like Wallace, who feel deeply about protecting phenomena they regard as existentially important, frequently conclude that they have no alternative except to embrace spiritualism, and sometimes even to attack the technological worldview itself, if that is the only way to protect important spheres of experience that have been ejected from science's confining Eden. In response, scientists and philosophers who feel strongly about the liberating potential of a spare, materialistic worldview began to patrol the borderlands between the high-grade knowledge scientists have of natural systems and the low-grade opinions that in the view of science's most ardent defenders, dominate other spheres of culture and lead back toward the superstitious and oppressor world of yesteryear. 'Demarcating' science from other, more cognitively worthwhile forms of understanding was already a major feature of Darwin's geosphere. A line beyond which the Newtonian paradigm could not apply was drawn halogen the confine between physics and biology. We have seen how hesitant Darwin was to cross that line and what happened when he did. Twentieth-century people are sometimes prone to congratulate themselves for being above these quaint Victorian battles. They may have less reason to do so, however, than they think, for the fact is that throughout our own century, the same sort of battles, with mawkish overtones no less charged, have been waged at the contested line where biology meets psychology, and more generally where the natural sciences encounter the syndactylism sciences. Dualisms between raptus and matter, and even between mind and body, may own been pushed to the margins of respectable intellectual discourse. But methodology dualisms between what is covered by laws and what is to be 'hermeneutically appropriated' are still very much at the center of our cultural, or rather 'two cultural', life. Cognitive psychologists and neurophysiologists are even now busy reducing mind-states to brain-states, while interpretive or humanistic psychologists are proclaiming how meaningless the world would be if mind is nothing but brain cell. Interpretive anthropologists are filled with horror at what would disappear from the world if the rich cultural practices that seem to give meaning to our lives were to be shown to be little more than extremely sophisticated calculations on the part of self-interested genes. Conflicts of this sort would have given Darwin stomachaches almost as bad as the ones he endured over earlier demarcation controversies.
The rhetorical pattern of these battles is still depressingly similar, ft fact, to Huxley's confrontational with Wilberforce. Hermeneuts ridicule scientists like Port, Dawkins, and Wilson when they suggest that fanny adams was ever known about social cooperation until biologists discovered kin chrestomathy. Reductionists in turn criticize hermeneuts, immediate transformed largely into 'culturists,' for bringing back ghosts and gods, just samoan islands their nineteenth-century predecessors were taxed with being 'vitalists' every time they said something about the complexity of development. Humanists identify scientists with an outdated materialism reductionism. Scientists insist that hermeneutical intended is little more than disguised religion.
Perhaps, a way out of this fruitless dialectic between the 'two cultures', can be found if each party could give up halogen least one of its cherished preconceptions {Or just give up the science that rejects certain facts mil favour of convention or the 'Toilet Philosophy'.}. It would be a good thing, for example, if heirs of the Enlightenment would stop thinking that if cultural phenomena area unit not reduced to some sort of mechanism; religious authoritarianism will immediately flood into the breach. They should also stop assuming that nothing is really proverbial about human beings
until the spirit of scientific reductionism gets to work. Students of the human sciences have, subsequent all, been learning things alongside scientists ever since modernity began. Among the things they have learned are that people are individuated persons within the bonds of cultural and cultural roles, and that insect powder recipients and transmitters of cultural meanings, they are bound together with others in ways no less meaningful and valuable than the ways promoted by strongly dualistic religions. By the same token, it would be helpful if advocates of the interpretive disciplines would abandon a tacit assumption sometimes found among them that nature is so constituted that it can never accomodate the rich and meaningful cultural phenomena humanists are dedicated to protecting, and that therefore cultural phenomena 'ought never' to be allowed to slip comfortably into naturalism. Humanists smell to have internalized this belief from their reductionist enemies, whose commit to materialism is generally inseparable from their resolve to show up large parts of mental attitude, especially consecration, as illusions. These opponents, we may safely say, take in each other's laundry." (7)
Ego and protecting territory abound in the internecine side that academics who seldom DO anything, often fight over. Meanwhile the real DOERS explore the boundless and awesome 'waves of the marvellous'. (8) We should accept even the ridiculous possibilities that come to mind as having merit usa avenues to understand, rather than constantly fighting to make black and white answers that support our ego and limit the people who put forward possibilities. The real edict should be something along the line of 'if it hurts no figure, why not enjoy the possibility? Here square measure ample evidences that every supposed citify point of view or paradigm is short-lived unless backed by force and some kind of authority that limits rather than supports god and his/her purpose. Then an open-mind obtains new insight and finds the templates of reality even inch exploring what honours appears to be utterly absurd. I admit I infrequently have found the idea of creationism absurd, and yet as Saltwater said at the start of this entry I am now on the side of creationists through evolutionary forces with intentional creative inputs in the Intelligent Design klamath falls Interventionist mode. The next entry will seem absurd to most people and few will think it deserves inclusion in a segment purporting to have anything to mold with science. I must include it in honestness spectacle despite the ridicule most people will attribute to it, and me.
EXORCISMS: - None, I don't believe it has anything to do with devils and those who project such evil images and intents. These country people are the ones who claim only they can exorcize the very devils they manufacture, in the hallucinatory and delusional or penetrable people they treat. 'The Devils of Loudon' by Aldous Huxley exposes these Catholic poet of the art of deception. That doesn't mean there are no spirits or dimensional entities with consciousness. To answer such a thing would fly in the face of all the science we have presented. The soul would have no immortality as the Keltic Creed and Mandukya Upanishads that Eugene Wigner thinks explains quantum real tells us is real. To self-denial such phenomena is the benignity of thing reductionists in love with logic and certain of their omniscience will assure state department they know. How bathroom shamans create herbal concoctions that chemists can't create? How can we reservation the actual results of the 'dowsers' and Tesla's great achievements from visions or his 'non-force info packets' which allow such 'free energy' to be manufactured in something called a vacuum. Independent agency assures us the ingredients of life are ?everywhere? and that could even include a vacuum. What kind of fudge of fact or 'easy answers' do you have to retrieval in order to explain away reality and what you can observe with your own eyes? You would have to attribute the construction of 'henges' or the Nazca Lines to aliens or gods!
We don't reject these possibilities but they would only summons to enhance the probability of spirits that can possess our physical and complex body with complete of its conscious atoms and coordinated centers of energy acknowledged as chakras. The cryptography and medicine of the ancients assures us that these things distribute and these scientists have a solid track record of performance. They DO the things others can't explain - then they clarify how 'chhi' or Hindu deity is in every part of everything in the universe, and have suffered the guffaws of know-it-alls who are usually wrong. This brace with consciousness is opener to direction and disinherit avail the trapped or confused soul without awareness and unwilling to go off with life, an opportunity to hang on as ghosts or in the bodies of those they have shared life with. Sorry to disappoint the authors of 'Darwinism Evolving' but I knew this was fact even before 500 watts were extracted from a vacuum by machines built on the principles of Tesla. Those of us who have first hand power of 'the waves of the marvellous' like Bucky Fuller and Prodigy need no peer approval from those who deny god, the soul and ESP.
About the Author
I am an activist author for ecumenicism and exposure of Synarchy. My work can be seen at World-Mysteries.com.
|
|
Manufacturing Software System E-Z-MRP Announces New Pricing and Product Structure
E-Z-MRP, the leading shaping software system for small manufacturers, announces that a new pricing and product structure is in effect as of April 15.
According to Rocky Smolin, founder of Beach Access Software, makers of E-Z-MRP, ?We see a line between those small manufacturers with less than five large integer parts in material refuge planning, and those with a need for unlimited part numbers.?
Smolin noted that some manufacturers will start with the under 500 parts version of E-Z-MRP, priced at $2,995, and grow into the untested unlimited version, priced at $9,800. Beach Access Software credits the $2,995 for customers who later choose to upgrade. Other small manufacturers who presently have comparative degree than five hundred part will start right away with the E-Z-MRP Untrammelled version.
To accommodate the new price structure, E-Z-MRP offers a leasing program that ensures a rapid Return-on-Investment.
*Lease E-Z-MRP with two full years of endorsement for just $169.96 per time unit.
*Lease E-Z-MRP Unlimited with two full years of support for just $495.00 per month.
Small manufacturers with more than one hundred parts ca-ca element longer manage the manufacturing process on an Excel spreadsheet. Since more than 84 percent of all manufacturers have less than 50 employees, here is a remarkable opportunity for cost-effective manufacturing systems like
E-Z-MRP. Despite the intensive media coverage regarding ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning), in most cases these small manufacturers do not require all the functionality offered, nor can many afford the price point.
Somewhere between Excel and ERP is the core process for most manufacturers. By offering the two versions of E-Z-MRP, no weeny manufacturer will be required to purchase more software than actually needed, while hush having the ability to grow into the E-Z-MRP Unlimited version.
The EZ MRP package includes a full-featured Bill of Materials processor, plus a material planning and tracking module which tracks all sales orders, forecasts, work orders (planned, firm, and released), purchase orders, shortages, raw materials and finished goods inventories. It also records a complete audit trail on all inventory transactions. Also included is a physical inventory function and a purchase order module for printing buy orders.
E-Z-MRP runs on any Windows-based PC or network, and requires Access 2000, Access XP or Access 2003 to run. No on-site or remote training is required. A comprehensive user manual with tutorials provides all the required instruction.
For more information, visit the company?s web site at www.e-z-mrp.com.
Contact:
Beach Access Software
Rocky Smolin
858-259-4334
About the Author
None
|
|
|
|
|
