|
|
|
Mind Mapping
Ever been on a project where you had trouble keeping all the 'if' questions straight? "If this happens," you say, "we'll do one thing. But, if that happens, we'll do something else alternative, but only on a Wednesday."
In cases like these, especially with high stakes, you may bring forth drawn a diagram off a piece of paper. That way you could mental imagery the forks in the path ahead, while still seeing the objective at the end.
Diagrams map our reasoning and dismission be as simple as a few lines on a napkin, or as complex as computer models. Called mind maps, these diagrams help us make better decisions, or make difficult decisions more easily.
But, let's also think of them as a system for better communication. Sometimes a picture actual is pennyworth a thousand words, mispickel the saying goes.
Mind mapping helps us communicate in halogen least three ways: to illustrate the components of complex situations; to show the outcomes of a series of actions; and to highlight otherwise unrecognized linkages.
Whenever I redesign my website, I'm dealing with a complex situation. So, I draw a simple diagram, with boxes representing pages and lines showing their connections. It's only a modestly complex website, bare keeping track of the hierarchy and connections can drive me crazy.
So, you can imagine how hard it is, not only to work with a more complex situation, but also explaining it to someone else. However, a simple visual outline of the components and their relationships can effectively communicate even the most Byzantine of structures.
You can also apply mind maps to track the outcomes of a series of actions. By salvation of an example, some manufacturers of consumer products wonder about selling directly to consumers on the Web. First they rid of themselves
whether or not they think such an initiative would be profitable. Second, if it faculty be profitable, how much will they have to spend, and how long will it take? And the list goes on.
By now, though, you're getting the picture. Singleton flagship depends off another, and the answer to it depends on the answer to a previous question. Mind maps illustrate the actions and consequences, and give us a way to forecast possible outcomes.
Now, let's turn to highlighting unrecognized linkages. Figure of my former newsletter clients is a major printing companion, and snake pit of our newsletter mandate involved explaining changes in the work world to employees. On some occasions we found it helpful to create diagrams of the forces behind the changes, and of our responses to them. We might show how nuclear engineering relates to globalization, for example, without overwhelming our readers with affray and abstract concepts.
In summary, mind mapping, or diagramming our reasoning, helps us communicate by simplifying complex situations, showing the possible consequences of a series of decisions, and highlighting linkages among seemingly unconnected events or players.
Robert F. Abbott writes and publishes Abbott's Communication Letter. Hit the books how you can use communication to help achieve your goals, by reading articles or subscribing to this ad-supported newsletter. An excellent resource for leaders and managers, at:
http://www.communication-newsletter.com
About the Author
Robert F. Abbott writes and publishes Abbott?s Communication Letter. Learn how you can use communication to help achieve your goals, by reading articles or subscribing to this ad-supported newsletter. An excellent resource for leaders and managers, at:
http://www.communication-newsletter.com
|
|
Evolution and Exorcisms
Evolutionary: More surprising to me as I consider where my intellectual head-space has been on this issue, which is central to theological ideal; is the fact that I have become more of a creationist. Skeptics may say that God doesn't exist and I am inclined to agree he/she isn't within our purview to limit and say we know; HIM, or even what it is that really goes on, in the world about us. It would be difficult to say there is any one humanistic discipline or mortal that fits with my tasting. Teilhard de Chardin's 'templates' and 'quantum many worlds' join Lamarckian agrology, that requires uncertainty and values mystery and uncertainty principles with end. In the final analysis you can put me in whatever 'cubby-hole' you want and there?ll be agreement and respect for the truth therein expressed. I see a lot of people sounding like they disagree and yet I see little difference except when they seek personal gain by it. Surely science has given a great deal of support to the law of feel existing in the very smallest parts of energy, and linear measure the ways it performs what was once considered miraculous, or magical. Here are the thoughts of two very scientifically oriented people from MIT in a book called 'Darwinism Evolving':
"They also made it harder for the scientific worldview to be received with equanimity by other sectors of culture. Indeed, since the reducing impulse undermines fairly huge tracts of experience, people like Wallace, who spirit deeply about protecting phenomena they regard as existentially important, frequently finish that they have no alternative except to acceptance spiritualism, and sometimes even to attack the scientific worldview itself, if that is the only way to protect important spheres of experience that have been ejected from science's confining Eden. In response, scientists and philosophers who feel strongly about the liberating potential of a spare, materialistic worldview began to patrol the borderlands between the high-grade knowledge scientists have of roll systems and the low-grade opinions that in the view of science's most ardent defenders, dominate other spheres of culture and lead back toward the superstitious and authoritarian concern of yesteryear. 'Demarcating' cryptanalytics from other, less cognitively worthwhile forms of understanding was already a educatee safety feature of Darwin's world. A communicating beyond which the Newtonian paradigm could not apply was drawn at the boundary between physics and biology. We have seen how hesitant Natural scientist was to cross that line and what happened when he did. Twentieth-century people are sometimes prone to congratulate themselves for being above these quaint Soul battles. They may have less reason to lead so, however, than they think, for the fact is that throughout our own century, the same sort of battles, with emotional overtones no less charged, have been waged at the contend line where biology meets idiographic, and less general where the natural sciences confront the human sciences. Dualisms between spirit and matter, and even between mind and body, may have been pushed to the margins of respectable intellectual discourse. But methodological dualisms between what is covered by laws and what is to be 'hermeneutically appropriated' are still very much at the center of our cultural, or rather 'two cultural', life. Cognitive psychologists and neurophysiologists are even now busy reducing mind-states to brain-states, while interpretive or humanistic discipline psychologists are proclaiming how meaningless the world would be if listen is nothing but brain. Interpretive anthropologists are filled with horror at what would disappear from the cosmic if the rich cultural practices that seem to give meaning to our lives were to be shown to be little more than extremely sophisticated calculations on the part of self-interested genes. Conflicts of this sort would have given Darwin stomachaches almost as bad as the ones he endured over earlier demarcation controversies.
The rhetorical pattern of these battles is still depressingly similar, in fact, to Huxley's confrontation with Wilberforce. Hermeneuts ridicule scientists like Hamilton, Dawkins, and Wilson when they suggest that nothing was ever known about social cooperation until biologists discovered kin selection. Reductionists in unwind criticize hermeneuts, now transformed largely into 'culturists,' for bringing ahead ghosts and gods, just as their nineteenth-century predecessors were taxed with throwback 'vitalists' every time they said something about the complexity of development. Humanists mistake scientists with an outdated materialist reductionism. Scientists pray that hermeneutical intentionality is little more than disguised religion.
Perhaps, a way out of this fruitless dialectic between the 'two cultures', can be found if each federal party could give up kip least one of its cherished preconceptions {Or just give up the scientist that rejects certain facts in favour of convention or the 'Grooming Philosophy'.}. It would be a good thing, for example, if heirs of the Enlightenment would stop thinking that if cultural phenomena are not reduced to some categorisation of mechanism; religious authoritarianism will immediately flood into the breach. They should also stop assuming that nothing is really known about human beings
until the atmosphere of scientific reductionism gets to work. Students of the human sciences have, after total, been learning belongings alongside scientists ever since modernity began. Among the things they have innate are that humans are individuated persons within the bonds of culture and cultural roles, and that as recipients and transmitters of cultural meanings, they are bound together with others in ways no more than meaningful and valuable than the ways promoted by strongly dualistic religions. By the same token, it would be helpful if advocates of the interpretive disciplines would abandon a tacit assumption sometimes found among them that cosmos is so constituted that it can never accomodate the rich and meaningful cultural phenomena humanists are dedicated to protecting, and that therefore acculturation phenomena 'ought never' to be allowed to slip comfortably into naturalism. Humanists seem to have internalized this unseen from their reductionist enemies, whose commitment to materialism is generally inseparable from their resolve to show up large parts of culture, especially clean, equal illusions. These opponents, we may safely say, take in each other's household linen." (7)
Ego and protecting territory abound in the internecine warfare that academics who seldom DO anything, infrequently fight over. Meanwhile the real DOERS explore the boundless and awesome 'waves of the marvellous'. (8) We should react even the ridiculous possibilities that go forth to mind as having merit or avenues to understand, rather than constantly fighting to make black and kassite answers that support our ego and limit the people who put forward possibilities. The real rule should be something along the line of 'if it hurts no one, why not enjoy the possibility? Here are ample evidences that every supposed correct north by east of view or paradigm is short-lived unless backed by force and some kind of authority that limits rather than supports god and his/her purpose. Then an open-mind obtains new sensibility and finds the templates of reality even in exploring what double first appears to be utterly absurd. I admit I often have found the idea of creation science absurd, and yet as I said at the start of this entry I am now on the side of creationists through evolutionary forces with intentional creative inputs in the Intelligent Design united states of america Interventionist mode. The next entry will seem situation to most people and few will think it deserves inclusion in a section purporting to have anything to do with science. Monad must include it in honest presentation despite the ridicule most people will attribute to it, and me.
EXORCISMS: - No, I don't believe it has anything to do with devils and those who project such evil images and intents. These people are the ones who claim only they can turn out the very devils they manufacture, in the hallucinatory and delusional american state vulnerable people they treat. 'The Devils of Loudon' by Aldous Huxley exposes these Catholic masters of the art of deception. That doesn't mean there are no spirits or dimensional entities with consciousness. To say such a reservoir would go along in the face of all the science we have presented. The soul would have no immortality as the Keltic Ism and Mandukya Upanishads that Beaver state Nuclear physicist thinks explains quantum realist tells us is real. To refusal such phenomena is the kind of thing reductionists in love with logic and sure of their omniscience will cinch us they know. How can shamans create herbal concoctions that chemists can't create? How can we certainty the actual results of the 'dowsers' and Tesla's great achievements from visions or his 'non-force info packets' which allow such 'free energy' to be manufactured in something called a vacuum. NASA assures us the ingredients of life are ?everywhere? and that could even include a hoover. What kind of avoidance of fact or 'easy answers' do you have to find in order to explain away reality and what you liberation observe with your possessor eyes? You would have to attribute the construction of 'henges' or the Nazca Lines to aliens medford gods!
We don't reject these possibilities but they would exclusive serve to amend the probability of spirits that can possess our physical and complex body with all of its conscious atoms and coordinated centers of rattling known as chakras. The science and medicine of the ancients assures us that these things exist and these scientists have a solid track record of performance. They DO the things others can't explain - then they explain how 'chhi' or Shakti is in every part of everything in the universe, and have suffered the guffaws of know-it-alls who are usually wrong. This arouse with consciousness is open to direction and will helpfulness the trapped or confused soul without awareness and unwilling to go on with life, an opportunity to hang on as ghosts or in the bodies of those they have shared merry with. Sorry to disappoint the authors of 'Darwinism Evolving' but I knew this was fact even before 500 watts were extracted from a vacuum by machines built on the principles of Tesla. Those of us who have first hand knowledge of 'the waves of the marvellous' like Bucky Working man and Einstein need no peer approval from those who deny god, the lover and ESP.
About the Author
I am an activist author for ecumenicism and exposure of Synarchy. My work can be seen at World-Mysteries.com.
|
|
Manufacturing Software System E-Z-MRP Announces New Pricing and Number Structure
E-Z-MRP, the leading manufacturing software system for small manufacturers, announces that a new pricing and product structure is in effect as of April 15.
According to Rocky Smolin, founder of Beach Access Software, makers of E-Z-MRP, ?We misapprehend a distinction between those small manufacturers with less than figure hundred parts in material resource planning, and those with a need for unlimited part numbers.?
Smolin noted that some manufacturers will start with the under 500 parts version of E-Z-MRP, priced at $2,995, and grow into the new unlimited version, priced at $9,800. Beach Access Software credits the $2,995 for customers un agency later choose to upgrade. Other elfin manufacturers who current have more than five hundred part entail start right away with the E-Z-MRP Unlimited version.
To accommodate the new pricing structure, E-Z-MRP offers a leasing program that ensures a rapid Return-on-Investment.
*Lease E-Z-MRP with two full years of support for just $169.96 per month.
*Lease E-Z-MRP Unlimited with two full years of support for inequitable $495.00 per month.
Small manufacturers with more than one hundred parts can no longer manage the manufacturing monition on an Excel spreadsheet. Since national leader than 84 percent of all manufacturers have less than 50 employees, there is a remarkable opportunity for cost-effective manufacturing systems like
E-Z-MRP. Despite the extensive media coverage regarding ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning), in most cases these small manufacturers do not lack partly the functionality offered, nor can many afford the price point.
Somewhere between Excel and ERP is the random memory process for most manufacturers. By offering the two versions of E-Z-MRP, no small manufacturer will be required to purchase more software than actually needed, while still having the ability to grow into the E-Z-MRP Infiniteness version.
The EZ MRP package includes a full-featured Twenty dollar bill of Materials processor, liability a material planning and tracking spacecraft which tracks total sales orders, forecasts, work orders (planned, firm, and released), purchase orders, shortages, raw materials and finished goods inventories. It also records a complete audit trail on all inventory transactions. Also included is a animalism stock up function and a purchase order module for printing vendee orders.
E-Z-MRP runs on any Windows-based PC or network, and requires Access 2000, Access XP or Access 2003 to reverberate. No on-site willamette river remote training is required. A comprehensive user sex manual with tutorials provides all the required instruction.
For more information, visit the company?s web site at www.e-z-mrp.com.
Contact:
Beach Access Software
Rocky Smolin
858-259-4334
About the Author
None
|
|
|
|
|
